Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Carter, in the matter of the Spectrum Fire Group [2012] FCA 1202 Citation: Carter, in the matter of the Spectrum Fire Group [2012] FCA 1202
Parties: PHILIP PATRICK CARTER, CHRISTOPHER CLARKE HILL, GRANT DENE SPARKS, DANIEL MATTHEW BRYANT AND STEPHEN GRAHAM LONGLEY (IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF THE COMPANIES IN THE SPECTRUM FIRE GROUP NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE)
File number: NSD 837 of 2012
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2012
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 477(2B)
Date of hearing: 31 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the plaintiffs: E Hyde
Solicitor for the plaintiffs: Jones Day
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 837 of 2012
BETWEEN: PHILIP PATRICK CARTER, CHRISTOPHER CLARKE HILL, GRANT DENE SPARKS, DANIEL MATTHEW BRYANT AND STEPHEN GRAHAM LONGLEY (IN THEIR CAPACITY AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF THE COMPANIES IN THE SPECTRUM FIRE GROUP NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE)
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 31 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the plaintiffs be granted leave to: a) enter into the litigation funding deed between the plaintiffs, the companies named in the Schedule attached and Westpac Banking Corporation (as annexed marked "Confidential Annexure PPC5" to the affidavit of Philip Patrick Carter dated 18 June 2012); and b) engage Jones Day, solicitors for the plaintiffs, as outlined in Jones Day's letter dated 18 October 2011 (as annexed marked "Annexure PPC6" to the affidavit of Philip Patrick Carter dated 18 June 2012). 2. Annexures to the affidavit of Philip Patrick Carter dated 18 June 2012 marked "Confidential Annexure PPC4" and "Confidential Annexure PPC5" remain confidential on the Court file and be filed in a sealed envelope and not be made available for inspection by any person without any further order of this Court. 3. An order that the costs of this application be costs in the winding-up of the companies named in the Schedule attached. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate