Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner [2012] FCA 1219 Citation: O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner [2012] FCA 1219
Parties: VINCENT THOMAS O'DONOGHUE v AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL and MINISTER FOR JUSTICE
File number: WAD 200 of 2012
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 5 November 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a four month adjournment of a hearing – relevance of applicant's status as a self-represented and incarcerated litigant
Cases cited: O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner (No 2) [2012] FCA 1152 Tinkler v Elliott [2012] EWCA Civ 1289
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 October 2012
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: A Ladhams
Counsel for the Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: A Gerrard
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 200 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate