Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZRCN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1236 Citation: SZRCN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1236
Appeal from: SZRCN & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 597
Parties: SZRCN, SZRCO and SZRCP v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1079 of 2012
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 9 November 2012
Date of hearing: 6 November 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 56
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr A Kumar
Solicitor for the Appellants: Rasan T Selliah & Associates
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr M Alderton
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the Second Respondent: There was no appearance for the Second Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1079 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZRCN
First Appellant
SZRCO
Second Appellant
SZRCP
Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: LANDER J DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to amend the notice of appeal be dismissed. 2. The appeal be dismissed. 3. The first appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate