Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 5) [2012] FCA 1241 Citation: De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 5) [2012] FCA 1241
Parties: DE BRETT SEAFOOD PTY LTD (ACN 093 552 366) and J WISBEY & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 959 851) v QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901), LUFTHANSA CARGO AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD (ARBN 001 056 195), SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD (ARBN 095 934 857), CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED (ARBN 000 479 514), AIR NEW ZEALAND LTD (ARBN 000 312 685), AIR NEW ZEALAND (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 084 974 569), JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED (ARBN 000 564 358) and BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC (ARBN 002 747 597)
File number: VID 12 of 2007
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 9 November 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applications for leave to file cross-claims against other airlines – whether requirements of rule 15.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) complied with – inappropriate to rule on applications where application to amend statement of claim foreshadowed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 191 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 15.04, 15.05 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 45(2)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emirates [2012] FCA 1108 – referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Malaysian Airline System Berhad (No 2) [2012] FCA 767 – referred to De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 3) [2011] FCA 1059 – referred to De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 4) [2011] FCA 1426 – referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate