Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hughes on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People (No 2) v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1267 Citation: Hughes on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People (No 2) v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1267
Parties: NELSON HUGHES, PETER STEVENS AND EVA CONNORS ON BEHALF OF THE EASTERN GURUMA PEOPLE v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, SHIRE OF ASHBURTON, YAMATJI MARLPA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION, HAMERSLEY EXPLORATION PTY LTD, HAMERSLEY IRON PTY LTD, HAMERSLEY RESOURCES LTD AND ROBE RIVER MINING CO PTY LTD
File number: WAD 6208 of 1998
Judge: BENNETT J
Date of judgment: 20 November 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination of native title – requirements of s 87 – whether proposed consent determination within power – whether proposed consent determination appropriate – proposed determination within power and appropriate
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 47A, 47B, 56, 66, 81, 87, 94A, 225 Native Title Amendment Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Barunga v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 518 Billy Patch v Western Australia [2008] FCA 944 Griffiths v Northern Territory (2007) 165 FCR 391 Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 Lota Warria (on behalf of the Poruma and Masig Peoples) v Queensland (2005) 223 ALR 62 Moses v Western Australia (2007) 160 FCR 148 Northern Territory v Alyawarr (2005) 145 FCR 442 State of Western Australia v Sebastian (2008) 173 FCR 1 Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate