Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AB (deceased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268 Citation: AB (deceased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268
Parties: AB (DECEASED), JEFFREY BROWN, CLINTON COOKE AND CHARLIE COPPIN ON BEHALF OF THE NGARLA PEOPLE (NGARLA), AB (DECEASED), JEFFREY BROWN, CLINTON COOKE AND CHARLIE COPPIN ON BEHALF OF THE NGARLA PEOPLE (NGARLA #2), PC (DECEASED) AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE NJAMAL PEOPLE #10 and FF (DECEASED) AND OTHERS (NOMADS) ON BEHALF OF THE WARRARN PEOPLE v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS
File numbers: Part WAD 6185 of 1998 Part WAD 77 of 2005 Part WAD 82 of 1998
Judge: BENNETT J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – Application for determination of native title – claim for rights and interests by reason of licence or permission given by the relevant normative society – whether the relevant normative society was the language group or a broader Pilbara society – whether licence or permission given – whether licence or permission gave recipients rights or interests in land pursuant to the traditional laws and customs – whether rights or interest granted by "permission" are rights or interests 'in relation to land' or personal rights – whether persons with "permission" have connection with land – whether applicants had been incorporated into the relevant society – whether the applicants are a "group" – whether applicants are a "traditional group" – whether evidence supports individual rights and interests NATIVE TITLE - Application for determination of native title – claim for exclusive possession of claim area – required evidence for a right of exclusive possession – whether there has been "real" acknowledgment or observance of the right in the absence of an ability to enforce – whether applicants are "gatekeepers" of claim area in the Griffiths v Northern Territory (2007) 165 FCR 391 sense – whether traditional laws and customs of ownership of land by local descent groups have been adapted – whether particular exclusive rights can be claimed in the absence of a right of exclusive possession –whether applicants had a right to be accompanied on land – whether right to be accompanied is a right of exclusive possession NATIVE TITLE - Extinguishment – section 47A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether land was held expressly for the benefit of Aboriginal people – meaning of 'expressly for the benefit of … Aboriginal peoples' – whether pastoral lease and special lease were granted, or land was held under leases, expressly for the benefit of Aboriginal peoples
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate