Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQLS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1274 Citation: SZQLS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1274
Appeal from: SZQLS v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 624
Parties: SZQLS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and IRENE O'CONNELL IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 1105 of 2012
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 12 November 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – refugee status assessment – independent merits review – decision of federal magistrate – judicial review on procedural fairness grounds – whether federal magistrate had considered all integers of the appellant's claim – reviewer's conclusion "subsumed in the findings of great generality" – adequate consideration of appellant's integers by federal magistrate – whether federal magistrate had regard to the perceived defects in the interview with the interpreter – the quality of interpretation was not so severely below a satisfactory standard as to prohibit the appellant advancing his case – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 425
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] 75 ALD 630 followed Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALJR 1088 followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 followed Perera v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 6 applied Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319 followed SZJZE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1653 considered WALN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 131 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate