Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZRCI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 1291 Citation: SZRCI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 1291
Appeal from: SZRCI v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 343
Parties: SZRCI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and RON WITTON IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 662 of 2012
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – procedural fairness – hearing rule – obligation to disclose material relied upon by decision maker – whether material available to decision maker – whether material relied upon by decision maker – whether any evidentiary basis for findings made ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – procedural fairness – onus of proof – whether applicant has proved breach of procedural fairness obligations EVIDENCE – relevance – relevance of additional evidence in judicial review applications – availability of Jones v Dunkel inference
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1, cited Attorney-General (NT) v Minister for Aboriginal Affairs (1989) 23 FCR 536, cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, cited Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707, 148 FCR 446, applied Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations [2011] FCAFC 8, 195 FCR 318 GTE (Aust) Pty Ltd v Brown (1986) 14 FCR 309, applied Hendy v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 602, 72 ALD 112, cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298, cited Lek v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 43 FCR 100, applied McCormack v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1700, 114 FCR 574 , cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQHH [2012] FCAC 45, 200 FCR 223, referred to Morley v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] NSWCA 331, 247 FLR 140, cited R v District Court of the Metropolitan District Holden at Sydney; Ex parte White (1966) 116 CLR 644, cited Sagar v O'Sullivan [2011] FCA 182, 193 FCR 311, cited SZJBD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 922, 102 ALD 622, followed SZRCI v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 343, affirmed SZRCI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 965, referred to Theo Holdings Pty Ltd v Hockey [2000] FCA 665, 99 FCR 232, cited VAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 117, applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate