Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQXE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1292 Citation: SZQXE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1292
Appeal from: SZQXE v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 643
Parties: SZQXE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and DAVID CORRIGAN IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 1180 of 2012
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – "well-founded fear of being persecuted" – basis of fear – relevance of future events – whether Independent Merits Reviewer had regard to events in "reasonably foreseeable future" MIGRATION – "well-founded fear of being persecuted" – practicality of return to home district – ability to safely travel – whether Independent Merits Reviewer had regard to practicality of claimant returning to Afghanistan – need for claimant to raise objection in interview with Reviewer
Legislation: 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees as amended by the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees
Cases cited: Applicant Z v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 325, cited AZABN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 526, cited AZABO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 525, 127 ALD 526, cited Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559, considered Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jama [1999] FCA 1680, considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Sameh [2000] FCA 578, considered Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Mok (1994) 55 FCR 375, cited NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263, 144 FCR 1, cited NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10, cited Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437, considered SZMCD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 46, 174 FCR 415, applied SZQEN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 387, 202 FCR 514, cited SZQXE v Minister for Immigration [2012] FMCA 643, affirmed WAAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 399, cited Warnakulasuriya v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Finkelstein J, 6 April 1998), cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate