Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1294 Citation: Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1294
Parties: RAYLENE REEVE v RAMSAY HEALTH CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA
File number: WAD 186 of 2012
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – no reasonable prospect of success – frivolous or vexatious INDUSTRIAL LAW – out of time application to Fair Work Australia – extension of time application refused – natural justice – Fair Work Australia not required to hold a hearing – bar under s 723 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 365, s 366, s 366(1)(a), s 366(1)(b), s 366(2), s 577, s 578, s 591, s 593(1), s 593(2), s 593(3), s 604, s 723, s 772(1), s 772(1)(e), s 773, s 774, s 774(2), s 777, Pt 3-1, Pt 6-4 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 26.01(a), R 26.01(b)
Cases cited: O'Donoghue v Australian Information Commissioner (No 3) [2012] FCA 1244 Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Australia Limited [2012] FWA 3141 Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Australia Pty Limited [2012] FWAFB 5601 Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Limited [2012] FMCA 120 Reeve v Ramsay Health Care Limited [2011] FWA 5349 The Queen v The Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Angliss Group [1969] HCA 10; (1969) 122 CLR 546
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate