Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Caper Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1305 Citation: Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Caper Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1305
Appeal from: Caper Pty Ltd T/a Direct Air Charter and Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] AATA 181
Parties: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY v CAPER PTY LTD
File number: VID 289 of 2011
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether matter should be remitted to Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be decided according to law COSTS – whether to award unsuccessful respondent a costs certificate under section 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth)
Legislation: Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth)
Cases cited: Commonwealth v Twyman (1985) 8 ALD 554 Harradine v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1989) 25 FCR 35 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health v Theologidis (1991) 33 FCR 186
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 289 of 2011
BETWEEN: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
Applicant
AND: CAPER PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: MURPHY J DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate