Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Puenmora v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1334 Citation: Puenmora v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1334
Parties: ALBERT PUENMORA, KEITH NENOWATT AND SUSAN BANGMORA ON BEHALF OF THE WANJINA WUNGGURR PEOPLE v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
File number: WAD 119 of 2011
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination of native title – requirements of s 87 – whether proposed consent determination within power – whether proposed consent determination appropriate – requirements of s 87 satisfied
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 47B, 56, 64(1B), 66, 87, 87A, 94A, 225
Cases cited: Barunga v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 518 Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 Goonack v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 516 Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427 Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Munn v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109; [2001] FCA 1229 Nangkiriny v State of Western Australia (2002) 117 FCR 6; [2002] FCA 660 Neowarra v Western Australia [2003] FCA 1402 Smith v State of Western Australia (2000) 104 FCR 494 Ward v State of Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate