Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DRH Holdings (Australia) Limited v David Reid Homes Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1336 Citation: DRH Holdings (Australia) Limited v David Reid Homes Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1336
Parties: DRH HOLDINGS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (ARBN 126 394 643) v DAVID REID HOMES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 108 203 827) and RUSS DAVID STEPHENS
File number: QUD 238 of 2009
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 28 November 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for declaration, injunctive relief, nominal damages and indemnity costs – proceedings stayed against first respondent and discontinued against third respondent – proceedings remaining on foot against second respondent – second respondent self represented – defence filed by second respondent but no affidavit material filed in accordance with Court orders for final hearing – hearing on merits PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – indemnity costs – relevant principles CONTRACT – whether agreement validly terminated – whether obligations on termination complied with – redirection of websites – denial of access to computer systems and email network TRADE MARKS – infringement – redirection of websites using trade marks
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 120 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.12
Cases cited: Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited De Alwis v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 77 cited Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) ATPR 40-748 cited InterTAN Inc v DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited [2005] FCAFC 54 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate