Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1358 Citation: Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1358
Parties: APPLE INC. v SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LIMITED
File number: NSD 1243 of 2011
Judge: COWDROY J
Date of judgment: 10 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Privilege – claim for privilege made in respect of documents produced in reasonable contemplation of litigation – challenge to basis of claim for privilege – evidence in support of privilege claim unsatisfactory – court inspecting documents for which privilege is claimed to determine whether privilege is properly maintainable – claim for privilege upheld PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: privilege – whether partial disclosure of documents has resulted in waiver of privilege – claim for waiver upheld
Cases cited: Abigroup Ltd v Atkins (1997) 42 NSWLR 623 Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd (1996) 137 ALR 28 Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Australian Agricultural Company Limited v AMP Life Limited [2006] FCA 37 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Energia SRL (No 2) (2012) 287 ALR 760 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores (1998) 81 FCR 526 AWB Limited v Cole and Anor (2006) 152 FCR 382 AWB Ltd v Cole and Anor (No 5) (2006) 155 FCR 30 Barnes v Commissioner for Taxation (2007) 242 ALR 601 Ensham Resources Pty Limited v AIOI Insurance Company Limited [2012] FCA 710 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 608 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Coombes (1999) 164 ALR 131 Fort Dodge Australia Pty Ltd v Nature Vet Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 501 Kennedy v Wallace and Others (2004) 142 FCR 185 Kirby v Centro Properties Ltd (No 2) (2012) 87 ACSR 229 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Mitsubishi Electric Pty Ltd v Victorian Work Cover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 National Crime Authority v S (1991) 29 FCR 203 Nickmar Pty Ltd v Preservatrice Skandia Insurance Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 44 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd (2005) 65 IPR 442 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (2008) 234 CLR 275 Re Southland Coal Pty Ltd (2006) 203 FLR 1 Rich v Harrington (2007) 245 ALR 106 Rio Tinto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2005) 224 ALR 299 Seven Network Limited and Anor v News Limited and Ors [2005] FCA 142 Telstra Corporation Limited v Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (No 2) [2007] FCA 1445 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 Waterford v Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 5 Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 ChD 675
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate