Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SC Johnson & Son Pty Limited v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1362 Citation: SC Johnson & Son Pty Limited v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1362
Parties: SC JOHNSON & SON PTY LIMITED ACN 000 021 009 v RECKITT BENCKISER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 003 274 655
File number: NSD 1365 of 2012
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2012
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – relief to be granted where respondent found to have contravened s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law – whether declaratory relief should be granted – form of declaration considered – whether injunctive relief should be granted
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) s 18 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21
Cases cited: Dynamic Supplies Pty Limited v Tonnex International Pty Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 675 Nick Scali Limited v Super A-Mart Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1500 SC Johnson & Son Pty Limited v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited [2012] FCA 1266
Date of hearing: 30 November 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr RPL Lancaster SC and Mr NR Murray
Solicitor for the Applicant: Addisons
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Webb SC and Mr MR Hall
Solicitor for the Respondent: Thomsons Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1365 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate