Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sensis Pty Ltd v Bivami Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1365 Citation: Sensis Pty Ltd v Bivami Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1365
Parties: SENSIS PTY LTD ACN 007 423 912 and UNIVERSAL PUBLISHERS PTY LTD ACN 000 087 132 v BIVAMI PTY LTD ACN 003 020 166 and WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
File number: NSD 1803 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 3 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to be joined as a party to the proceedings – whether party ought to be joined – application for dissolution of interlocutory injunctions on ground that necessary party not joined – application for dissolution of interlocutory injunctions on grounds of material non-disclosure – whether material non-disclosure – whether fresh interlocutory injunctions should be granted – application for leave to file cross-claim – whether separate questions ought to be heard and determined
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 9.05, 30.01
Cases cited: Barneys Blu-Crete Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union (1979) 43 FLR 463 Eurogold Limited v Oxus Holdings (Malta) Limited [2007] FCA 811 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Limited v White City Tennis Club Limited (2010) 241 CLR 1 News Limited v Australian Rugby Football League Limited (1996) 64 FCR 410 Thomas A Edison Limited v Bullock (1912) 15 CLR 679 Town & Country Sport Resorts (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Partnership Pacific Limited (1988) 20 FCR 540
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate