Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alam v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1371 Citation: Alam v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1371
Appeal from: Alam v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2012] FMCA 616
Parties: FASIUL ALAM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1066 of 2012
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 4 December 2012
Date of hearing: 15 November 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: T. Liveris
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1066 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FASIUL ALAM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 4 DECEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay to the first respondent costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1066 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FASIUL ALAM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate