Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
La Trobe Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd v KCRAM Pty Ltd (in liq) formerly known as PRP Valuers and Consultants Gold Coast Pty Ltd (No 1) [2012] FCA 1388 Citation: La Trobe Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd v KCRAM Pty Ltd (in liq) formerly known as PRP Valuers and Consultants Gold Coast Pty Ltd (No 1) [2012] FCA 1388
Parties: LA TROBE WHOLESALE FINANCE PTY LTD (ACN 115 893 939) v KCRAM PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) FORMERLY KNOWN AS "PRP VALUERS AND CONSULTANTS GOLD COAST PTY LTD" (ACN 091 511 125)
File number: VID 921 of 2012
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 5 December 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – whether leave to proceed against respondent in liquidation should be granted – respondent insured against liability – leave granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500 and s 562 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 82
Cases cited: Altinova Nominees Pty Ltd v Leveraged Capital Pty Ltd (Recs and Mgrs Apptd) (in LIQ) (No 2) [2009] FCA 42 Chand v Azurra Pty Ltd (in liq) (2011) 82 ACSR 383; [2011] NSWCA 58 Doran Constructions Pty Ltd v Beresfield Aluminium Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 499 Oceanic Life Ltd v Insurance and Retirement Planning Services Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 11 ACSR 516 Vagrand Pty Limited (in liq) v Fielding (1993) 41 FCR 550 Viscariello v Bernsteen Pty Ltd (in liq) (2004) 235 LSJS 277; [2004] SASC 266
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate