Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Commonwealth of Australia (No 1) [2012] FCA 1390 Citation: Li v Commonwealth of Australia (No 1) [2012] FCA 1390
Parties: TING LI v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 1494 of 2012
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interim injunction – whether balance of convenience favours grant of interim injunctive relief
Legislation: Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Defence (Personnel) Regulations 2002 (Cth) regs 15, 49, 119
Date of hearing: 23 November 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: AW Street SC, R Francois
Solicitor for the Applicant: Bainbridge Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: K Eastman SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1494 of 2012
BETWEEN: TING LI
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 7 DECEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The interlocutory application be dismissed. 2. Costs be costs in the cause. 3. The matter be listed for further directions on Thursday 13 December 2012 at 9.30 am. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1494 of 2012
BETWEEN: TING LI
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate