Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wurrunmurra v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1399 Citation: Wurrunmurra v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 1399
Parties: BANJO WURRUNMURRA, ADAM ANDREWS, JOHNNY MARR, BRADLEY WILLIAMS, RITA DANN, BILLY OSCAR, ISAAC HALE AND DANNY MARR ON BEHALF OF THE BUNUBA PEOPLE v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, KIMBERLEY DIAMOND COMPANY NL, EDWARD PERRY BASS, PR & JM CAMM, JUBILEE DOWNS PASTORAL CO PTY LTD, CALLUM HUGH MACLACHLAN, JOCK HUGH MACLACHLAN, W N M MCDONALD PTY LTD and TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
File number: WAD 6133 of 1998
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 12 December 2012
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – consent determination of native title – requirements of s 87A – whether proposed consent determination within power – whether proposed consent determination appropriate – requirements of s 87A satisfied
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13, 47, 47A, 47B, 64(1B), 56(2), 66A, 67, 87A, 94A, 225
Cases cited: Barunga v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 518 Brown v Western Australia [2007] FCA 1025 Goonack v State of Western Australia [2011] FCA 516 Hughes v Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 James v Western Australia [2002] FCA 1208 Lovett v Victoria [2007] FCA 474 Munn v Queensland (2001) 115 FCR 109 Nangkiriny v Western Australia (2002) 117 FCR 6 Nangkiriny v Western Australia [2004] FCA 1156 Ward v Western Australia [2006] FCA 1848
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate