Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jessup v HSBC Bank Australia Ltd [2012] FCA 1400 Citation: Jessup v HSBC Bank Australia Limited [2012] FCA 1400
Appeal from: Jessup v HSBC Bank [2012] FMCA 390
Parties: STEPHEN JESSUP v HSBC BANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED
File number: TAD 18 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2012
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – whether regulation 36(3) of the National Consumer Credit Protection Regulations 2010 (Cth) operates retrospectively
Legislation: National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) ss 177, 178, 179, 330 National Consumer Credit Protection (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Act 2009 (Cth) s 4 National Consumer Credit Protection Regulations 2010 (Cth) reg 36(3) Consumer Credit (Tasmania) Code ss 5 and 6 Consumer Credit (Tasmania) Act 1996 Consumer Credit (Tasmania) (Jurisdiction of Courts) Regulations 2006 Consumer Credit (Queensland) Code
Date of hearing: 16 November 2012
Place: Hobart
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr P McCarthy (McKenzie friend)
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Lunn
Solicitor for the Respondent: Simmons Wolfhagen
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION TAD 18 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: STEPHEN JESSUP
Appellant
AND: HSBC BANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate