Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Richards v Macquarie Bank Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1403 Citation: Richards v Macquarie Bank Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1403
Parties: TRACEY RICHARDS v MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED
File number: QUD 590 of 2010
Judge: REEVES J
Date of ruling: 12 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – admissibility of evidence – tendency evidence s 97 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – where tendency evidence constituted representations made by various financial advisers employed by the same corporation to 12 other customers –where relevant fact in issue was whether representations were made to the applicant by two financial advisers of the corporation on two separate occasions – whether the tendency evidence had "significant probative value" to a tendency of the corporation's financial advisers to make the alleged representations to the applicant – where the representations allegedly made to the applicant were of an unusual nature – where only one of the tendency evidence representations was "strikingly similar" in nature to the alleged representations – where that representation was made some time before the alleged representations – where that representation was made by different financial advisers at different locations from the alleged representations – whether striking similarity in the nature of that representation and the alleged representations outweighed by stark differences in timing and circumstances – whether conduct of individual financial advisers could be viewed as conduct of the corporation – where the number of incidents in which the tendency evidence representations were made represented only a small fraction of the corporation's operations in that period
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate