Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ACCC v AirAsia Berhad Company [2012] FCA 1413 Citation: ACCC v AirAsia Berhad Company [2012] FCA 1413
Parties: ACCC v AIRASIA BERHAD COMPANY NUMBER 284669-W
File number: VID 39 of 2012
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2012
Catchwords: CONSUMER PROTECTION – publication of the price of air travel services without specifying total price in a prominent way and as a single figure – contravention of s 48 of the Australian Consumer Law admitted – declaratory orders sought by consent – whether declaratory relief available under circumstances – fixing of penalty – whether multiple contraventions or single course of conduct – mandatory considerations relevant to fixing of penalty – other considerations relevant to fixing of penalty – whether adverse publication orders should be granted where pecuniary penalty fixed, declaratory orders made and undertaking proffered
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law, s 48, 224, 246, 247 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Passenger Movement Charge Act 1978 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 53C, 86D
Cases cited: ACCC v AAB Transmission and Distribution Limited (2001) ATPR 41-815 – cited ACCC v Dataline.net.au Pty Ltd (2006) 236 ALR 665 – cited ACCC v EDirect Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 976 – considered, followed ACCC v Global One Mobile Entertainment Limited [2011] FCA 393 – considered ACCC v Kaye [2004] FCA 1363 – cited ACCC v Leahy Petroleum (No 3) (2005) 215 ALR 301 – considered, cited, applied ACCC v Marksun Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 695 – considered, followed ACCC v Midland Brick Company Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 329 – cited ACCC v MSY Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) (2011) 279 ALR 609– considered, not followed, applied ACCC v Qantas Airways Limited(2008) 253 ALR 89 – cited ACCC v Sampson [2011] FCA 1165 referred to ACCC v Telstra Corp Ltd (2007) ATPR 42-207 – cited ACCC v TPG (No.2) [2012] FCA 629 – considered, distinguished ACCC v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No.2) [2002] FCA 1548 – considered Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 – cited .au Domain Administration Ltd v Domain Names Australia Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 521 – cited CPA Australia Ltd v Dunn (2007) 74 IPR 495 – considered, applied Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 – cited, considered Hospitals Contribution Fund Australia Ltd v Switzerland Australia Health Fund Pty Ltd (1988) ATPR 40-834 – cited Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 – cited Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Limited [1921] 2 AC 438 – referred to Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC (2012) 287 ALR 249 – considered, distinguished Trade Practices Commssion v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1995) ATPR 41-375 – cited Trade Practices Commission v Bata Shoe Company of Australia Pty Ltd (1980) 44 FLR 149 – considered, applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate