Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Ltd v Woff [2012] FCA 1415 Citation: Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Ltd v Woff [2012] FCA 1415
Parties: LIFEPLAN AUSTRALIA FRIENDLY SOCIETY LTD and FUNERAL PLAN MANAGEMENT PTY LTD v NOEL WOFF, RICHARD CORBY and FUNERAL PLANNING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
File number: SAD 99 of 2012
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 12 December 2012
Date of hearing: 6 August 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicants: M Douglas and T Martin
Solicitor for the Applicants: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Respondents: TJF McEvoy and S Kee
Solicitor for the Respondents: Arnold Bloch Liebler
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 99 of 2012
BETWEEN: LIFEPLAN AUSTRALIA FRIENDLY SOCIETY LTD
First Applicant
FUNERAL PLAN MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
Second Applicant
AND: NOEL WOFF
First Respondent
RICHARD CORBY
Second Respondent
FUNERAL PLANNING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Third Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 12 DECEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for a separate trial on the issue of liability only is refused. 2. The costs of the application are reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 99 of 2012
BETWEEN: LIFEPLAN AUSTRALIA FRIENDLY SOCIETY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate