Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilson v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1421 Citation: Wilson v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1421
Parties: THOMAS HUDSON WILSON v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 585 of 2011
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2012
Catchwords: IMMIGRATION – decision to cancel visa made pursuant to s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to review the decision on the ground that the application for review was filed by the applicant's authorised recipient out of the nine day period referred to in s 500(6B) – whether, as required by s 501G(1)(f)(ii), information was given in the notice in relation to the time in which an application for review could be made to the Tribunal – where inadequate or inaccurate information given: whether written notice duly given for the purposes of s 501G – whether the nine day period, referred to in s 500(6B), has commenced
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 66, 476A(1)(b), 494B, 494G, 494D, 500, 501G Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) r 2.55
Cases cited: Chan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 134 FCR 308 applied Pomare v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 167 FCR 494 applied Zhan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 128 FCR 469 applied
Date of hearing: 5 November 2012
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate