Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA LTD (ARBN 000 861 165)
File numbers: NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Suppression order – application by third party for suppression order – whether former s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) applies to application – whether, alternatively, new Part VAA applies – consideration of the requirements of new Part VAA and comparison with former s 50 – whether principles that applied to s 50 can be applied to s 37AG(1)(a) – whether suppression order should be made – whether age of documents precludes suppression order
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 4, 37AE, 37AF, 37AG, 37AH, 37AJ, 50, pt VAA Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Act 2012 (Cth) s 2, sch 2
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 43 FLR 129; [1980] FCA 33 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCA 1082 cited Cyclopet Pty Ltd v Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation [2012] FCA 1326 cited Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651 applied Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 12) [2010] FCA 62 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate