Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stankovic v Van Der Veld (No 2) [2012] FCA 1437 Citation: Stankovic v Van Der Velde (No 2) [2012] FCA 1437
Parties: MICHAEL STANKOVIC and MILKA DORDEVIC v TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE and JASON SHANE CRONAN
File number: NSD 626 of 2012
Judges: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 7 December 2012
Date of hearing: 7 December 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the applicant: J Walsh
Solicitor for the applicant: Darroll Nelson & Co.
Counsel for the respondents: D Ash
Solicitor for the respondents: Watson & Watson
Solicitor for the intervener: T Orlizki of Kent Attorneys
Solicitor for the second cross-respondent: S Richardson of Adrian Twigg & Co Solicitors and Conveyancers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 626 of 2012
BETWEEN: MILOVAN STANKOVIC
Applicant
AND: TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELD
First Respondent
JASON SHANE CRONAN
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 7 December 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an adjournment be refused. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 626 of 2012
BETWEEN: MILOVAN STANKOVIC
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate