Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sensis Pty Ltd v Bivami Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1449 Citation: Sensis Pty Ltd v Bivami Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 1449
Parties: SENSIS PTY LTD ACN 007 423 912 and UNIVERSAL PUBLISHERS PTY LTD ACN 000 087 132 v BIVAMI PTY LTD ACN 003 020 166, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED ACN 007 457 141 and AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED AS CUSTODIAN FOR HYPERION PROPERTIES SYNDICATES LIMITED; AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED AS CUSTODIAN FOR HYPERION PROPERTIES SYNDICATES LIMITED; UNIVERSAL PUBLISHERS PTY LTD ACN 000 087 132
File number: NSD 1803 of 2012
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs on an indemnity basis – whether costs of interlocutory application should be payable immediately
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Meaden v Bell Potter Securities Limited (No 3) [2012] FCA 1394 SPAR Licensing Pty Limited v MIS QLD Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1318
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 14 December 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr P R Whitford SC with Ms F T Roughley
Solicitor for the Applicants: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr T Sperber of Swaab Attorneys
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J M Harris
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate