Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MZYPM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1453 Citation: MZYPM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1453
Appeal from: MZYPM v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 220
Parties: MZYPM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and HUGH WYNDHAM, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: VID 230 of 2012
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 29 November 2012
Date of hearing: 29 November 2012
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr N Wood
Solicitor for the Appellant: Ravi James Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr W S Mosley
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 230 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MZYPM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
HUGH WYNDHAM, IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 29 NOVEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to rely on the proposed new grounds of appeal is refused. 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 230 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate