Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hookway v M I D Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1456 Citation: Hookway v M I D Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1456
Parties: TAMZIN PETA HOOKWAY v M I D PTY LTD (ACN 004 576 970), HOOKWAY AEROSPACE PTY LTD (ACN 004 996 114), BALLYVERGAN PTY LTD (ACN 009 575 731) and SOL-RIO PTY LTD (ACN 009 571 493)
File number: TAD 34 of 2012
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – s 466 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Consideration of principles of "genuine steps to resolve disputes" and conducting proceedings in a way consistent with the "overarching purpose" – implications for application of s 466 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – s 12(1) of the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) – ss 37N and 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – Costs consequences of failure to comply
Legislation: Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Centro Financial Synergy Group [2007] FCA 2084 Gore v Justice Corporation Pty Ltd (2002) 119 FCR 429 Superior IP International Pty Ltd v Ahearn Fox Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys [2012] FCA 282 Xat Ky v Australvic Property Management Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 1785
Date of hearing: Heard on papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate