Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ATS (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd v Dun Oir Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1460 Citation: ATS (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd v Dun Oir Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1460
Appeal from: ATS (Asia Pacific) Pty Ltd v Dun Oir Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1004
Parties: ATS (ASIA PACIFIC) PTY LTD ACN 147 044 068 v DUN OIR INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 110 238 983
File number: NSD 1472 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 16 November 2012
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) ss 5(1), 12, 14 Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) s 106
Cases cited: Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 applied
Date of hearing: 16 November 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Svehla
Solicitor for the Applicant: Pure Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr D McGovern with Mr P Newton
Solicitor for the Respondent: O'Connor Harris & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1472 of 2012
BETWEEN: ATS (ASIA PACIFIC) PTY LTD ACN 147 044 068
Applicant
AND: DUN OIR INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 110 238 983
Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 16 NOVEMBER 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant be granted leave to appeal from the orders made by the primary judge on 13 September 2012. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate