Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Daebo International Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star (No 3) [2012] FCA 1475 Citation: Daebo International Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star (No 3) [2012] FCA 1475
Parties: DAEBO INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING CO LTD v THE SHIP GO STAR
File number: WAD 373 of 2011
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2012
Catchwords: HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – application by respondent ship for stay of Full Court orders requiring payment of judgment sum to the successful appellant until hearing of respondent ship's special leave application by the High Court of Australia – whether circumstances were 'exceptional' to warrant exercise of 'extraordinary' decision to grant a stay – whether application for special leave would receive serious consideration by the High Court – balance of convenience where neither appellant nor owners of the respondent ship, both foreign entities, held assets in Australia – whether grant of stay would cause loss to successful appellant – balancing of all factors
Legislation: Judiciary Act 1903 s 35A
Cases cited: Birdon Pty Ltd v Houben Marine Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1217 Care Shipping Corporation v Itex Itagrani Export SA [1993] QB 1 Care Shipping Corporation v Latin American Shipping Corporation [1983] 1 QB 1005 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Myer Emporium Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 220 Daebo International Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 175 Daebo Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star (2011) 283 ALR 255 Daebo Shipping Co Ltd v The Ship Go Star [2012] FCAFC 156 Eastland Technology Australia Pty Ltd v Whisson (2003) 28 WAR 308 Esco Corporation v PAC Mining Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1018 Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Lovell (No 2) (1998) 20 WAR 79 Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 681 Metall und Rohstoff AG v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc [1990] 1 QB 391 Mutual Export Corporation v Asia Australian Express Ltd (The "Lakatoi Express") (1990) 19 NSWLR 285 Regie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (2002) 210 CLR 491 Rinehart v Welker (2012) 285 ALR 191 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538 Western Bulk Shipowning III A/S v Carbofer Maritime Trading APS (The "Western Moscow") [2012] 2 Lloyd's LR 163
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate