Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 5) [2012] FCA 1479 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 5) [2012] FCA 1479
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA LTD (ARBN 000 861 165)
File numbers: NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admissibility – business records – whether publication produced by business for promotional purposes is a record of the business
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 ss 59, 69
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) [2012] FCA 1355 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1363 cited Forbes Engineering (Asia) Pte Limited v Forbes (No 4) [2009] FCA 675 cited Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 406 cited McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 216 at [18]-[33] cited Murray v Rentworks Ltd (No 5) [2003] NSWIRComm 54 cited National Telecoms Group Ltd v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 455 cited Roach v Page (No 15) [2003] NSWSC 939 applied Roach v Page (No 27) [2003] NSWSC 1046 applied Southern Cross Airports v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWSC 349 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate