Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v P. T. Garuda Indonesia Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1481 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v P. T. Garuda Indonesia Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1481
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA LTD (ARBN 000 861 165)
File number: NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Admissibility – relevance – whether facts sought to be proved in cross-examination relevant to the case as pleaded
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 16.08
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) [2012] FCA 1355 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 6) [2012] FCA 1480 followed
Date of hearing: 18 December 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: J Halley SC, E Collins SC, J Clarke, C Arnott, J Clark, N Shaw, V Bosnjak, T Dinh
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: M Leeming SC, T Brennan
Solicitor for the Respondent: Norton White
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 955 of 2009
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA LTD (ARBN 000 861 165)
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate