Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Plate Glass Holdings Pty Limited as trustee for the R Gregg Family Trust v Fraser Gordon Investments Pty Limited [2012] FCA 1487 Citation: Plate Glass Holdings Pty Limited as trustee for the R Gregg Family Trust v Fraser Gordon Investments Pty Limited [2012] FCA 1487
Parties: PLATE GLASS HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED AS TRUSTEE FOR THE R GREGG FAMILY TRUST ABN 37 440 997 638 v FRASER GORDON INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED ACN 124 311 904, DDH NOMINEES PTY LIMITED ACN 109 544 916 and UNICORN HOLDINGS (NSW) PTY LIMITED ACN 115 598 699
File number: NSD 630 of 2012
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – documents produced on subpoena – implied undertaking – a substantive obligation – founded upon public interest considerations – release sought from undertaking – purpose to trace assets, investigate potential causes of action and to report breaches to authorities – release from undertaking allowed in part
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 184, 1315 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.23, 20.03 Federal Court Rules (Cth) O 15 r 18
Cases cited: Australian Trade Commission v McMahon (1997) 73 FCR 211, considered Bailey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1995] 1 Qd R 476, followed Blanch v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2004] NSWCA 461, 58 ATR 113, followed Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd v Minister for Resources [2007] WASCA 60, cited Clone Pty Ltd v Players Pty Ltd (In Liquidation Receivers Appointed) [2012] SASC 12, cited Commonwealth v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd [2001] WASC 282, 25 WAR 31, cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Karas [2012] VSC 143, cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10, considered Forty Two International Pty Ltd v Barnes [2010] FCA 397, applied Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36, 235 CLR 125, considered James G Oberg (Sales) Pty Ltd v Oberg [2012] FCA 722, 292 ALR 673, cited Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3, 218 ALR 283, considered Northbuild Constructions Pty Ltd v Discovery Beach Project Pty Ltd [2009] QCA 345, [2011] 1 Qd R 145, cited Rank Film Distributors Ltd v Video Information Centre (A Firm) [1982] AC 380, referred to Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd [1977] QB 881, applied Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217, cited ThoughtWeb Systems Pty Ltd v Loughnan (No 2) [2006] FCA 432, 230 ALR 515, cited Groves, The implied undertaking restricting the use of material obtained during legal proceedings (2003) 13 Aust Bar Rev 314
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate