Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bluebags Nominees Pty Ltd v Snowball [2012] FCA 1492 Citation: Bluebags Nominees Pty Ltd v Snowball [2012] FCA 1492
Parties: BLUEBAGS NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 133 551 532 v RONALD SNOWBALL, KAREN ELIZABETH SNOWBALL, RONALD SNOWBALL (JUNIOR) and LABEL PLUS (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 095 841 222
File number: QUD 671 of 2012
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2012
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – ex parte application by shareholder for leave sought to commence proceedings in name of company and for interim injunctive relief – alleged misapplication of company property by directors and manager – applicant a "person interested" pursuant to s 1324 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – sources of power to grant orders sought derived from s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and s 1324 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 236, 237, 1324 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23
Cases cited: Allen v Atalay (1993) 12 ACLC 7 followed
Date of hearing: 27 November 2012
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Savage SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Tucker & Cowen
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 671 of 2012
BETWEEN: BLUEBAGS NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 133 551 532
Applicant
AND: RONALD SNOWBALL
First Respondent
KAREN ELIZABETH SNOWBALL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate