Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Huang v Abayawickrama [2012] FCA 1504 Citation: Huang v Abayawickrama [2012] FCA 1504
Appeal from: Huang v Abayawickrama & Anor (No 1) [2012] FMCA 746 Huang v Abayawickrama & Anor (No 2) [2012] FMCA 747
Parties: HONG CUI HUANG v CHAMINDA ABAYAWICKRAMA and UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES
File number: NSD 1346 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 14 November 2012
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 1.40(a), r 26.01(d) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) s 51 Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) rr 1.05, 13.10(c), 13.03B(1)
Cases cited: Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 applied Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 applied Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 applied DA Christie Pty Ltd v Baker [1996] 2 VR 582 distinguished Huang v Abayawickrama [2011] FMCA 235 referred to Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 applied Jeffrey & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 75 applied Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 applied Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427 applied Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 distinguished Re Luck (2003) 203 ALR 1 applied Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 Tinkler v Elliott [2013] CP Rep 4; [2012] EWCA Civ 1289 applied University of New South Wales v Huang [2012] FCA 308 referred to University of Wollongong v Metwally [No 2] (1985) 960 ALR 68; 59 ALJR 481 applied Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate