Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal [2012] FCA 1507 Citation: Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal [2012] FCA 1507
Parties: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL
File number: WAD 264 of 2012
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Legislation: Property Law Act 1969 (WA) s 89 Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth) rr 8.21(1)(d), 10.24, 10.42, 10.43(2) & (4), 10.51 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 7, r 9 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 37A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(a) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 4, 5A Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 121
Cases cited: Alstom Ltd v Sirakas [2010] NSWSC 669 Andrew (as trustee for the estate of Ward (dec'd)) v Zant Pty Ltd (rec and mgr apptd) (2004) 213 ALR 812 Applecross Pte Ltd (ARBN 079 372 722) v Lim (No 2) [2010] FCA 589 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Kokos International Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 2035 Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation (2008) 39 WAR 1 Bridge Shipping Pty Limited v Grand Shipping SA (1991) 173 CLR 231 British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v Taleb (No 1) [2012] FCA 1065 Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v Oswal (No 7) [2012] FCA 1185 Commonwealth v Westwood (2007) 241 ALR 381 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2004) 212 ALR 551 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2007] FCA 124 Marcolongo v Chen (2011) 242 CLR 546 Porter v Freudenberg [1915] 1 KB 857 Re Hyams; Offical Receiver v Hyams (1970) 19 FLR 232 Regal Castings Ltd v Lightbody [2009] 2 NZLR 433 Ricegrowers Co-operative Ltd v ABC Container Line NV (1996) 138 ALR 480 Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd v Tarrant [2011] FCA 1067 Westpac Banking Corporation v The Bell Group Ltd (in liq) [No 3] [2012] WASCA 157 Ho v Akai Pty Limited (in liquidation) ACN 001 500 714 [2006] FCAFC 159 Cell Tech Communications Pty Ltd v Nokia Mobile Phones (UK) Ltd (1995) 58 FCR 365 WSGAL Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 39 FCR 472
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate