Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ewin v Vergara (No 2) [2012] FCA 1518 Citation: Ewin v Vergara (No 2) [2012] FCA 1518
Parties: JEMMA EWIN v CLAUDIO VERGARA
File number: VID 494 of 2011
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 12 December 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – privilege against self incrimination – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 128 – objection by respondent to give evidence under cross-examination – whether reasonable grounds for the objection as required by s 128(2) – whether the existence of reasonable grounds denied by the low risk of potential prosecution – whether the privilege conferred by s 128 was inapplicable to a witness who had given evidence voluntarily on the subject matter of the objection – whether in those circumstances such a witness "objects" within the terms of s 128(1) – whether reasonable grounds for the objection were denied because the respondent had waived the privilege – whether common law principles of waiver applicable – whether privilege waived because the respondent voluntarily gave a record of interview to Police – whether privilege waived by reference to the admission of particular facts in a defence – whether privilege waived by reason of the respondent giving evidence in chief or giving evidence without objection in cross-examination on subject matters in respect of which an objection is later sought to be taken under s 128(1) – whether such conduct is inconsistent with the maintenance of the privilege – objection disallowed – whether an objection confined to the giving of evidence without the protection of a certificate given pursuant to s 128 may have led to a different result.
Legislation: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) ss 38, 39, 53 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 128 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 9(1) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) ss 14, 28B Heydon JD, Cross on Evidence (8th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2010) Odgers S, Uniform Evidence Law (10th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2012) Cases cited: Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation v Westinghouse Electric Corporation (1978) AC 547 Cornwell v R (2007) 231 CLR 260 Song v Ying (2010) 79 NSWLR 442 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Workcover Authority (NSW) v Tsougranis (2002) 117 IR 203 Versace v Monte [2001] FCA 1572 BTR Engineering (Australia) (Formerly Borg-Warner Australia Ltd) v Patterson (1990) 20 NSWLR 724 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Accident Insurance Mutual Holdings Ltd v McFadden (1993) 31 NSWLR 412 Registrar of the Supreme Court of South Australia v Zappia (2003) 86 SASR 388 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Mining Projects Group Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 32 Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) v Craven (1994) 126 ALR 668
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate