Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Storm Financial Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) (No 7) [2012] FCA 1522 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Storm Financial Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) (No 7) [2012] FCA 1522
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v STORM FINANCIAL LIMITED (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 064 804 691, BANK OF QUEENSLAND LIMITED ACN 009 656 740 and MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED ACN 008 583 542
File number: QUD 577 of 2010
Judge: REEVES J
Date of Ruling: 29 October 2012
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – agreed statement of facts – hearsay – business records exception s 69(2) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – where statement made about clients' conduct by financial adviser in email – whether financial adviser could have personal knowledge of the clients' conduct in the period before she was the clients' financial adviser – whether inferences about the financial adviser's knowledge could be drawn from evidence outside the email in question – where computerised record system maintained
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2005) 216 ALR 320; [2005] NSWSC 417 NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power & Water Authority [1999] FCA 1549
Date of hearing: 29 October 2012
Date of publication of reasons: 12 March 2013
Place: Brisbane
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate