Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQVM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 5 Citation: SZQVM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 5
Appeal from: SZQVM v Minster for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 416
Parties: SZQVM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 919 of 2012
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 15 January 2013
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from order of Federal Magistrate dismissing application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal to affirm decision not to grant protection visa – whether Tribunal erred in placing no weight upon evidence of two emails received by appellant asserting risk of harm to appellant should appellant return to originating country, due to emails containing hearsay – whether Tribunal had opportunity to test evidence of emails and verify authenticity – whether Tribunal should and did so test – whether Federal Magistrate erred in finding evidence of emails was not in Tribunal's possession prior to Tribunal hearing – whether Tribunal erred in placing little weight on evidence of witness, due to evidence containing hearsay – discussion of constitution, powers, operation, and treatment of evidence, by Tribunal PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice of contention sought to be filed beyond time limit prescribed by r 36.24 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – where no explanation given for model litigant's failure to comply with rules
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 59, 60, 62, 63, 64 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 36.24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36, 47, 65, 91R, 411, 414, 415, 420, 424, 425, 427, 428, 429A, 430, 496 Prison Act (Fiji)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate