Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Christanty v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] FCA 33 Citation: Christanty v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] FCA 33
Appeal from: Christanty v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2012] FCA 1360
Parties: ENNY CHRISTANTY, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
File number: NSD 2235 of 2012
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 31 January 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – application for extension of time in which to seek leave – appeal from summary judgment – whether amended notice of appeal discloses a question of law – whether there is a reasonable argument that the order for summary judgment should be set aside
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 187 FCR 261 Christanty v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2012] FCA 1360 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499
Date of hearing: 31 January 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate