Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Swift Seat Australia Pty Ltd v The Harrington Global Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 43 Citation: Swift Seat Australia Pty Ltd v The Harrington Global Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 43
Parties: SWIFT SEAT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 133 527 312), GREGORY JOHN TEMPLEMAN and ANNIE-MARIE CAROL TEMPLEMAN v THE HARRINGTON GLOBAL CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 142 503 311) and ANDREW MICHAEL JOHN HARRINGTON
File number: VID 711 of 2011
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 1 February 2013
Date of hearing: 1 February 2013
Date of last submissions: 1 February 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: The Second Plaintiff appeared in person. No appearance by the First and Third Plaintiffs.
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr LEP Magowan
Solicitor for the Defendants: Saines Lucas
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 711 of 2011
BETWEEN: SWIFT SEAT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 133 527 312)
First Plaintiff
GREGORY JOHN TEMPLEMAN
Second Plaintiff
ANNIE-MARIE CAROL TEMPLEMAN
Third Plaintiff
AND: THE HARRINGTON GLOBAL CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 142 503 311)
First Defendant
ANDREW MICHAEL JOHN HARRINGTON
Second Defendant
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 1 FEBRUARY 2013 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to r 39.05(f) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the proceeding be reinstated. 2. There be judgment for the Defendants against the First Plaintiff in the sum of $356,765.36 plus interest of $43,398.31 (being simple interest on $350,000 at the rate of 10% per annum from 15 November 2011 to 1 February 2013) and costs of and incidental to the application, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. 3. There be judgment for the Defendants against the Second and Third Plaintiffs in the sum of $156,765.36 plus interest of $18,246.58 (being simple interest on $150,000 at the rate of 10% per annum from 15 November 2011 to 1 February 2013) and costs of and incidental to the application, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement. 4. There be liberty to apply. Note: Orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate