Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Haile-Michael v Konstantinidis (No 3) [2013] FCA 53 Citation: Haile-Michael v Konstantinidis (No 3) [2013] FCA 53
Parties: DANIEL HAILE-MICHAEL, JIBRIL GOD, SHUAB ALI, MAKI ISSA, HAKIM HASSAN and MAGNUS KABA v NICK KONSTANTINIDIS, SHANE DAVIES, NICK O'BRIEN, PAUL GILMOUR, CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF VICTORIA POLICE and STATE OF VICTORIA
File number: VID 969 of 2010
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2013
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for particular discovery under r 20.21 of Federal Court Rules 2011 – where documents sought by applicants not part of respondents' case – where applicants claim that documents necessary to test respondents' defence – where extensive discovery previously ordered PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside subpoenas – whether application more appropriately dealt with by trial Judge
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011
Date of hearing: 4 February 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: CATCHWORDS
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Rapke SC, Mr E Nekvapil and Ms P Knowles
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate