Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
London City Equities Ltd (No 4) v Penrice Soda Holdings Ltd [2013] FCA 64 Citation: London City Equities Ltd (No 4) v Penrice Soda Holdings Ltd [2013] FCA 64
Parties: LONDON CITY EQUITIES LTD v PENRICE SODA HOLDINGS LTD
File number: NSD 1841 of 2010
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 6 February 2013
Catchwords: COSTS – whether plaintiff should pay the defendant's costs of the interlocutory application
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 247A
Date of hearing: 6 February 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Ms A Rose of Watson Mangioni Lawyers Pty Limited
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr EC Muston
Solicitor for the Defendant: Kelly & Co
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1841 of 2010
BETWEEN: LONDON CITY EQUITIES LTD
Plaintiff
AND: PENRICE SODA HOLDINGS LTD
Defendant
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Subject to Order 1 made on 12 December 2012, the defendant's interlocutory application dated 30 November 2012 be otherwise dismissed. 2. The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the defendant's interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1841 of 2010
BETWEEN: LONDON CITY EQUITIES LTD
Plaintiff
AND: PENRICE SODA HOLDINGS LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate