Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mentink v Minister for Home Affairs [2013] FCA 68 Citation: Mentink v Minister for Home Affairs [2013] FCA 68
Parties: WILFRED JAN REINIER MENTINK v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS
File number: QUD 559 of 2012
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for extension of time – substantive application for judicial review under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5(1)(e) – relevant principles – merits of substantive application – Minister's decision pursuant to Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 (Cth) s 156(2)(c) – entitlement to reasons – Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Sch 2 para (eaa) – extension of time not warranted
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Sch 2 para (eaa), ss 5, 5(1)(e), 11, 11(3), 13 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 (Cth) ss 3(1), 5(1), 7, 8, 156, 156(2)(b), 156(2)(c)
Cases cited: Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 cited
Date of hearing: 8 February 2013
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S McLeod
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 559 of 2012
BETWEEN: WILFRED JAN REINIER MENTINK
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate