Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NC (deceased) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 70 Citation: NC (deceased) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 70
Parties: NC (DECEASED) AND OTHERS v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
File number: WAD 6005 of 2003
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2013
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application under s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) to replace the current applicant – whether authorisation of replacement applicant at the meeting was effective – whether anterior question of whether there was a traditional decision-making process was addressed – whether there was a decision-making process adopted by the meeting – whether Court should exercise its residual discretion not to allow s 66B application, even if technical requirements met, where substantial minority faction would no longer be included in replacement applicant
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 66B, 251B
Cases cited: Anderson v State of Western Australia (2003) 134 FCR 1 Butchulla People v State of Queensland (2006) 154 FCR 233 Coyne v State of Western Australia [2009] FCA 533 Daniel v State of Western Australia (2002) 194 ALR 278 Daniel v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 536 Holborow v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1428 Lawson on behalf of the 'Pooncarie' Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [2002] FCA 1517 Noble v Mundraby, Murgha, Harris and Garling [2005] FCAFC 212 P.C. (name withheld for cultural reasons) on behalf of the Njamal People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 1054 'Pooncarie' Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v NSW Minister for Land & Water Conservation [2006] FCA 25 Roe v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2011] FCA 102 Ward v Northern Territory of Australia (2002) 196 ALR 32
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate