Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (ARBN 000 312 685) (No. 7) [2013] FCA 83 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (ARBN 000 312 685) (No. 7) [2013] FCA 83
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ARBN 000 312 685) AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v P.T. GARUDA INDONESIA LTD (ARBN 000 861 165)
File number(s): NSD 534 of 2010 NSD 955 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 18 February 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – business records exception to hearsay rule – application of rule to documents created in contemplation of proceedings – Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 69(3) - investigation by European Commission – relationship between Commonwealth and ACCC for the purpose of determining parties to proceedings EVIDENCE – discretion to exclude – inability to cross examine author of business record
Legislation: Auditor-General Act 1997 (Cth) Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 8 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Pt IV, ss 6A, 7(2), 27, 29 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 69, 69(3), 135, 135(a) Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth) Financial Management and Accountability Regulations 1997 (Cth) Sch 1 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Public Service Act 1999 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate