Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BZACE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2013] FCA 95 Citation: BZACE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2013] FCA 95
Parties: BZACE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 443 of 2012
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2013
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Rule 5.23, 17.04, 39.05
Cases cited: BZACE v Minister for Immigration [2012] FCA 1303 cited
Date of hearing: 4 February 2013
Place: Adelaide (via video link with Brisbane)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R White
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 443 of 2012
BETWEEN: BZACE
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BESANKO J DATE OF ORDER: 4 FEBRUARY 2013 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE VIA VIDEO LINK WITH BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's interlocutory application filed on 11 December 2012 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the said interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 443 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate