Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Blewitt v Telstra Corporation [2013] FCA 110 Citation: Blewitt v Telstra Corporation [2013] FCA 110
Appeal from: Blewitt and Telstra Corporation [2012] AATA 25
Parties: DIANNE BLEWITT v TELSTRA CORPORATION
File number(s): ACD 18 of 2012
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 21 February 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – questions of law – questions do not arise – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Cases cited: Commission for Safety Rehabilitation & Compensation of Commonwealth Employees v Rawling (1993) 42 FCR 421
Date of hearing: 30 January 2013
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Shillington
Solicitor for the Applicant: Brian Hatch Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: S Whybrow
Solicitor for the Respondent: DLA Piper Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA CANBERRA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 18 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: DIANNE BLEWITT
Applicant
AND: TELSTRA CORPORATION
Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 21 FEBRUARY 2013 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate